Welcome to The Hunger Games Wiki! Thanks for your edit to the User talk:Jake R page.
How do you know? On the Capitol Couture website it says nothing about that picture being of Effie. It could be any Capitol model. Provide me witrh proof and it will stay, otherwise the lack of evidence will cause it to be removed. Necterine411 Talk HG Fanon Avatar Fanon 00:21, January 12, 2012 (UTC)
Okay, sounds like good evidence. However, I think the profile picture from before was better, as it shows Effie like what she will look like in the movie. How about the picture still goes in the article, just not as the profile picture? Necterine411 Talk HG Fanon Avatar Fanon 00:45, January 12, 2012 (UTC)
The profile picture should be kept as it is. Instead, the picture should go under the film section, after it has been expanded with the info about whatever it is Effie is being used to sponsor. (So if Effie's sponsoring nail polish it will say the brand, a little bit about it and Effie's involvement, with the picture beside it. Necterine411 Talk HG Fanon Avatar Fanon 01:10, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
You make a good case, but you shouldn't change a profile picture without asking around to get everyone's opinion. I'll make a blog about it and see what everyone else thinks. Necterine411 Talk HG Fanon Avatar Fanon 01:41, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
Re: Capitol page
People have also been adding images from the "Capitol Couture" website; it's hard to tell which images come from where. If you upload an image that is official, include information saying so or explaining where it came from in the file upload. -TagAlongPam (talk) 12:50, February 14, 2012 (UTC)
hi this moive looks good
Photo additions to Cato article
Since you and Rainbow Shifter disagree about the photos being added to the Cato article, please discuss them in that article's talk page instead of edit warring over this, so you can get some additional perspectives. I've left this same message with both of you. Thanks. BrokenSphere (Talk) 05:29, May 16, 2012 (UTC)
That picture is doing nothing good to the article. It isn't a very clear picture anyway and its not really needed. Pictures are there only if they are clear (not blurred), appropriate and to show people what something looks like. We already know that Cato's last moments are on the Cornucopia whilst battling with Katniss and Peeta so we do not need a blurred and dark picture of three tributes on the Cornucopia when we can't even see their faces. Plus the picture of Cato with blood all over his face is seriously not needed. Therefore I am removing them for the FINAL time and you are not to put them back onto the wiki.
Seriously they are not doing any good to the wiki. How about you do some worthy edits rather than trying to keep posting pictures that aren't needed. Rainbow Shifter 09:18, May 16, 2012 (UTC)
BS? Whats that? OKay so now you are resorting to name calling as your final line of defence. You know what, I'm not going to argue with you! The bottom line is: They aren't doing any harm, but they aren't doing any good. The Cornucopia one is barely visable and if I didn't remove both the pictures then somebody else would have. Rainbow Shifter 14:12, May 16, 2012 (UTC)
Hey there :) Where did you get the new picture of Effie for her page? Thanks. Alexisfan07 03:40, May 19, 2012 (UTC)
Inserting images into pages
Can you do other editors a favor when inserting images into pages:
- Don't insert images into section headers, as they will then get treated as part of the header.
- Inserting image coding within paragraph text makes it harder to edit. Try to keep them out of the paragraphs and on their own before and after paragraphs, clearly separated by hard returns.
Re: D4 tribute boy
It isn't very clear. You can barely see the body shape and it didn't really help the article because I personally couldn't see anything there other than crates and a tiny blob in the middle. It didn't even show his face!
You see I left the other picture that you edited in for the District 3 girl when she died because it was clear. Plus it seems a lot of people have had complaints about the pictures that you put onto articles. You might want to check out our new image policy.
Sorry, how is that an attack? Just stating a fact that maybe you shouldn't add images to articles when they have not been approved by a member of the wiki's staff. A lot of things weren't clear in the film. Doesn't mean we should add them into articles. Rainbow Shifter (talk) 21:55, August 6, 2012 (UTC)
I am reverting the edit because the picture should NOT be there at ALL.